Categories
Uncategorized

Daylight saving time (DST) impacts on Windows Small Business Server 2003 (SBS 2003)

Sean on his Windows Small Business Server blog posted today that “there are no unique SBS 2003 updates required, although there are updates required to several SBS components (windows Server, Exchange Server, Outlook 2003, Windows SharePoint Services).”


This applies to all versions of SBS, That’s SBS RTM, SBS SP1, SBS R2, etc.


And as I said previously, please stay tuned for more information on a possible encore live event, as well as for general introduction and coverage of DST impacts: watch our Daylight Saving Time 2007 web page on Microsoft.com for more info. (Please see http://www.microsoft.com/dst2007.) 


Tags: , , , , , .

Categories
Uncategorized

Now available: WebCast on Windows 2000 updates for daylight saving time

In case you missed Jorge Lopez in the Support WebCast on Daylight Saving Time and Windows 2000, the WebCast is now available for off-line viewing here  (at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930688/en-us). In it, Jorge covers the daylight saving time (DST) changes for 2007, and we also answered a number of questions on DST in general.


Offline viewing download: If you wish to download a copy of this broadcast to your local hard drive for playing off-line, we provide this as a separate file (.zip archive) that you can download.  (http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/5/3/8535cb71-6c90-4375-87fb-8908d692cb70/wc011807.wmv.zip


And please stay tuned for more information on a possible encore live event, as well as for general introduction and coverage of DST impacts: watch our Daylight Saving Time 2007 web page on Microsoft.com for more info. (Please see http://www.microsoft.com/dst2007.)  As I said previously, this public page on the Microsoft.com site will be revised regularly to include new product updates, compatibility information and links to Knowledge Base articles.


Tags: , , , , , .

Categories
Uncategorized

WebCast on DST and Windows 2000 today was a success

Kudos to our fearless presenter Jorge Lopez in the Support WebCast on Daylight Saving Time and Windows 2000. Today’s WebCast covered the daylight saving time (DST) changes for 2007 and provided an overview of the changes to Microsoft Windows 2000. From the response I think that Jorge did a very good job.


Due to the popularity of this WebCast, it will be available in on-demand and downloadable format at here. (http://support.microsoft.com/pwebcasts).


And please stay tuned for more information on a possible encore live event, as well as for general introduction and coverage of DST impacts: watch our Daylight Saving Time 2007 web page on Microsoft.com for more info. (Please see http://www.microsoft.com/dst2007.)  As I said previously, this public page on the Microsoft.com site will be revised regularly to include new product updates, compatibility information and links to Knowledge Base articles.


Tags: , , , , , .

Categories
Uncategorized

Guess what? New Microsoft info for Daylight Saving Time (DST) 2007 changes

It’s the end of another work week and guess what: it’s time once again to update our Daylight Saving Time 2007 web page on Microsoft.com. (Please see http://www.microsoft.com/dst2007.) In general, more on Daylight Saving Time can be found also at http://www.answers.com/topic/daylight-saving-time.


As I said previously, this public page on the Microsoft.com site will be revised regularly to include new product updates, compatibility information and links to Knowledge Base articles. This week we have a few new additions, including the details for the update to Windows SharePoint Services (KB article 924881).


And no, I’m not changing this blog to the DST blog.


My the factoid of the day: today, a quick query on Live.com Search for DST in 2007 lists 169,932 results, with 413,239 results for DST alone. My money is that the number will increase between now and March 11, 2007.


Interestingly enough as reported on Bloomberg News, “springing forward may not help save energy, according to a study by the University of California at Berkeley.”



“U.S. plans to cut electricity usage by lengthening daylight saving time may backfire, the report said. Lengthening daylight saving time by several weeks was included in energy legislation passed in 2005, with the goal of saving energy equivalent to 100,000 barrels of oil a day.


“Extending daylight saving time may actually result in increased electricity demand as additional usage during morning hours cancels out the reduced demand in the evening, according to the Berkeley study. The paper analyzed electricity usage in Australia, which lengthened its daylight saving time by two months while hosting the 2000 Olympics.


“There is no evidence that extending daylight saving time will lead to energy savings,” said Hendrik Wolff, one of the study’s authors, in an interview. “Actually, there is evidence that it may lead to a little higher energy consumption.” 


Now here’s the really happy news: we may go through this change again as “Congress retains the right to revert the Daylight Saving Time back to the 2005 time schedule once the Department of Energy study is complete.” This to be decided after the US Secretary of Energy (Samuel Bodman) reports back to Congress on what the impact of the change has been in the US. (That will be an interesting meeting.)


Whether you agree or disagree with the change to DST, what can you do? For starters, write your state and federal government officials and let them know: in the States, you can find more information on contacting your senators and representatives in DC by going to http://www.usa.gov/Agencies/Federal/Legislative.shtml. The EFF has a website to help you contact US policymakers: http://www.eff.org/congress/.


And remember: even though you may not live in the US or Canada where the changes will be felt, people around the world will be impacted, particularly companies with operations, offices, subsidiaries or connectivity to systems based in the US, Canada or Mexico. This change to US DST has a global impact, so if you live outside the US and Canada, consider contacting your own government officials and tell them what you think.


Tags: , , , , , .


Also available at http://bit.ly/azB6Gu

Categories
Uncategorized

Article: Recovering files by reinstalling Windows, Mac virus protection

Thsi week in Patrick Marshall’s Q&A column on technology, there are two items that struck home for me:


Reinstalling Windows to recover lost files: The first was Mr. Marchall’s advice on “reinstalling Windows may help retrieve photos.” A reader asked what they should do when their “daughter’s computer wouldn’t boot and displayed a message stating that Windows System 32 was missing. All I wanted was to get her pictures off her hard drive.”


Mr. Marshall suggests reinstalling Windows. The error message you’re getting implies that important system files have been corrupted, whether by a problem with the drive or by a virus. That being the case, you’ll need to boot from your Windows disk and reinstall Windows. Assuming you’re able to reinstall, choose to install over the current version. Above all, do not choose the option to reformat the drive prior to installing.


More info on how to do this is detailed on Nick Peers’ good tutorial on reinstalling Windows, and mentioned in this PC World article.


I also agree with Marshall’s suggestion to use a reputable hard-drive data-retrieval service if the drive is damaged and you’re not able to reinstall Windows.


One more thing: back up your files regularly. If you don’t have a writable CD or DVD drive (or even if you do) a handy and ever more affordable way to back up your files is to a USB 2.0 Flash Drive. I found several brands of flash drives (which I refer to as memory fobs, sometimes getting a blank stare at the office) for less than $20 for 1 GB. I use these at home for archiving our photos and important documents, and keep a small spare flash drive in our emergency kit with copies of important family documents and information.


Note on Mac OS X anti-virus: Also of interest in this week’s column was this on Mac AV:



“I wrote that even users of Apple computers should employ anti-virus software, explaining that while there are fewer viruses reported for Apple computers, especially for those using the newest Mac OS X operating system, there are still viruses.


“I was inundated with responses from Mac users, many of whom claimed there are no viruses that target the Mac OS X. While it is interesting to find that so many users feel so passionately about their choice of operating system, it is dangerous to operate under the assumption that your computer does not need anti-virus software.


“Indeed, there is no operating system in the world that is not vulnerable to viruses.


“There were, in fact, so many e-mails that I cannot respond to them individually. Accordingly, I want to again urge readers with more questions to visit the Web site I mentioned in the article: www.securemac.com. You will find extensive coverage there of existing vulnerabilities and viruses affecting Mac OS X and other Apple operating systems.”


I have a Mac at home (actually, more than one… it’s a long story.) and I wouldn’t think to have them on the Internet or our network without AV. I received a number of mails from Mac users to my blog post on “Mac or PC Security, it doesn’t matter: be prepared” and why I noted that being prepared in this example costs me nothing. I have a choice to purchase additional security if I choose. And that’s what I have done for both my Macs (with Norton AV, but I am considering switching to Intego) and my PCs (OneCare with Etrust).


Tags: , , , .